#OutToLunch: Group savings could help young people become homeowners

By Denis Jjuuko

For most people, owning a home is the ultimate dream. It is a key component of what constitutes the American dream. In many parts of Africa, a boy only becomes a man if they owned a house.

At kwanjula (betrothment) events, you hear spokespersons of the groom to be bragging that the man who is intending to marry already owns a house, when they are mentioning his home address to which the congregation claps incessantly in wonder. It confirms, somewhat, the potential of the man to look after the bride.

But like we heard recently as the country marked the World Habitat Day, housing in Uganda is increasingly becoming a pipe dream for the majority of Ugandans. Apparently, 76% of the population won’t be able to afford to build or own a decent home. That is such a huge number. The cost of land and building materials are way too out of reach for the majority of Ugandans.

That shouldn’t be very nice for any government to hear. Home ownership is a cornerstone of stability. The biggest asset the majority of people will ever own is a home. And once they own a home, it means that they have a big stake in their country. They will do whatever it means to protect their biggest asset. So, they won’t be involved in burning down a street on which they own a home.

There is a lot government can do to ensure that this happens. Ensuring people have sustainable jobs, affordable mortgage rates, social security linked to home ownership, tax deductions on building materials etc.

However, sometimes, the government may not do all those things. They may leave individuals to do it on their own. So how can people, especially those that banks may not describe as “high net worth”, be able to afford a decent house?

Home ownership in Uganda, at least for the majority, starts with the ability to own land. Land that is affordable is usually far from urban centres without any utilities such as water and electricity. For many young people, living in such an area can be scary so they end up postponing to buy land.

By the time they have raised some money to buy land in a place that they consider livable, they are taken to the same place which was extremely rural a few years ago but it is now unaffordable to them. The places they can afford are again so rural.

However, they now have school going children which means less money at their disposal. Before they know it, it is retirement time and no house. They now hope that their children would be able to look after them. The poverty cycle continues.

How can young people afford to build and own homes affordably? At least those who earn a regular income?

They will need to come together either as friends or relatives and save money together consistently for some time. They don’t have to be so many, a maximum of about eight people. When they are too many, so many interests will come up and they may lose focus. They can consistently save money for about 3 years. If each of them saves Shs50,000 per a month, it means that that they will have Shs4.8m by the end of the first year. If they invest this money in a unit trust at about 12% annually, they will have an extra Shs576,000 after one year of investing it.

If they invest Shs400,000 every month after their initial investment of Shs4.8m, at the end of the 3-year saving cycle, they will have at least Shs16,197,120 according to an online compound interest calculator. That is why compound interest is sometimes called the 8th wonder of the world.

With Shs16.1m, the group of eight can now look for an acre of land to buy at about 15m, which they can now divide among themselves. If eight of you decide to buy land in an area you consider rural, you won’t be scared of living there because you will have the security of your neighbours.

Anyaway, each member should be able to get a 50x100ft plot in a well organised estate. With the Shs1.1m balance, they can now employ the services of an architect to design eight houses for them. The houses should look exactly the same and should be of the same size. They should not be fancy storied houses that are too expensive to build. Simple would do it. The dream is to own a home, not a Hollwood-esque home!

In the design, there are things they can share, such as septic tanks and a perimeter wall but that can come in later.

Now that they are good at saving and investing, they can double their monthly savings to Shs100,000. If they invest Shs9.6m and continue investing Shs800,000 per a month at 12% annually, they would have Shs32,394,240 by the end of 3 years. Depending on the design they choose and materials they use, they could now be able to build a house or two for every member every 3 years. In 12-24 years, each of those members will be able to own a decent mortgage free house.

The writer is a communication and visibility consult. djjuuko@gmail.com

Related

Out to Lunch

#OutToLunch: Favourable interest rates are good for everyone, not just government blueprint for politicians and entrepreneurs building churches

#OutToLunch: A blueprint for politicians and entrepreneurs building churches By Denis Jjuuko When it comes to religion, many times politicians, billionaire entrepreneurs, the middle class and other classes agree. At least on building magnificent houses of God. Across Uganda, many people have contributed or even single handedly built these houses of God. Fancy to a fault, majestically standing on hills with spires that compete with those seen in Hollywood movies. Many of these worship centres, particularly those single handedly built by one person or a family with their friends, are usually located in rural areas where the funders were born, walked barefoot to school before migrating to Kampala to find fortune and fame. The floors are of Italian or Spanish marble, porcelain or at worst polished terrazzo. Stained glasses with the beautiful image of the Virgin Mary complete the curvy life size windows. The pews are of the hardest wood. The world’s best sound engineers come in to install the public address system. The house of God must be fancy. Once construction is complete, they call in their Kampala friends for the grand opening. The clergy lines up at the foot of the building to welcome them. The parking lot is full of the most expensive SUVs. The parishioners walk in every prayer day fearful of stepping on the floors, sometimes so shiny that they see their own body reflections. Their best clothes can’t even be used to clean the pews. They can scratch them. For a moment, the poor are in heaven before returning to their houses where floors are screeded with cow dung. There is nothing wrong with people using their fortune and connections to build grand churches or mosques. It is their money; their appreciation of what God has helped them achieve. They no longer have some of these other problems so they can “give back” to God. The problem is whether the grandeur church is what the community really needs. Shouldn’t politicians, the rich and famous first do a needs assessment? Usually, besides the magnificent house of God stands a school with a falling roof or whose walls are being held in place by crooked timber poles. Windows are just wide openings where mild steel frames would do. Inside some of the classrooms, are anthills. Pupils sit on logs and like their homes, the cow dung is the main material used for floor screeding. Teachers look like they last had a decent meal on Christmas day. The health centre is miles away and poorly equipped. The only hope for survival whenever they fall sick is through prayer in the church built for them by the only person who was lucky enough to survive the biting poverty. Yet the funders go to India or Kenya or Germany whenever they feel any discomfort. And are not afraid to give testimony that last time they fell sick, they traveled to Europe for better management and while there, they were thankful to God for their life hence the magnificent church building. Yet the blueprint for an impactful church exists. In most cases wherever the Catholics built a church, they built a school as well and almost everywhere they set up their regional headquarters (read a diocese), they built a functional hospital. They knew that you can’t pastor the dead! They also knew that an educated population is good for them and their beliefs. Some people call it sustainability and perhaps that is why they have existed for millennia. You saw how they put on a show at Pope Francis’ funeral. Why can’t politicians and billionaire businessmen do the same? If you have Shs6 billion (nearly US$2 million) like we heard of the Ssembabule church or the one in Mitooma, why not build a church of Shs2 billion, a school of Shs2 billion and a healthy centre of Shs2 billion? You could also may be build all those with about 70% of the kitty and create an endowment fund with the remaining 30%. The annual interest from the fund could be used to operate the school and the hospital. If 30% of Shs6b is invested say in a long-term treasury bond, it could give a net return of approximately Shs255m per a year or Shs21.3m per a month, enough to subsidize a rural school and health facility. Alternatively, an income generating project could be established alongside the church building. A factory to add value for the parishioners. It could be a dairy plant or a coffee factory depending on the area. A scholarship for the needy bright students could be another alternative. That way people wouldn’t have to meet their creator ahead of time. The writer is a communication and visibility consultant. djjuuko@gmail.com

Read More »
Out to Lunch

#OutToLunch: Favourable interest rates are good for everyone, not just government only we could learn from Pope Francis

#OutToLunch: If only we could learn from Pope Francis By Denis Jjuuko The death of Pope Francis came a little bit as a surprise. He had been seen publicly on Easter Sunday, another surprise, blessing the faithful from the balcony that overlooks St Peter’s Square. Even though he was visibly weak, it seemed he was on the road to recovery after spending more than a month in hospital being treated of double pneumonia. He was 88 years old. Pope Francis is the third pope to die in the last 20 years following John Paul II in April 2005 and Benedict XVI in December 2022 even though he (Benedict) had long resigned from this position due to ill health. That decision of Benedict to resign allowed Francis to assume office in March 2013. Less than two years after his election, Pope Francis made the long trip to Uganda, becoming the third pope to do so largely thanks to the Uganda martyrs. And like most of the papal visits especially to countries like ours, everything comes to a standstill. Roads are paved, buildings are rehabilitated and grass is planted, public holidays granted and that wasn’t any different in 2015. People traveled from far and near to attend the mass that he led. Even our politicians who usually don’t see eye to eye were seen shaking hands at the Uganda Martyrs Shrine in Namugongo. One wished the pope visited every day! Those who met the Pope either in Uganda, the Vatican or elsewhere all talk about his humility. As he departed Uganda, a photo is shared of him climbing the steps to his Shephard One aircraft at Entebbe International Airport. He was walking alone, one hand sometimes holding his papal soutane, and another carrying a black bag, perhaps with personal belongings. He could have had as many aides as he wished. He was the leader of more than a billion Catholics but he lived simply and perhaps sending a message to nobodies that they too can be humble. Many ministers in Uganda never carry their handbags, there is always somebody at hand to do so. He refused to move in expensive limos or SUVs while visiting Kampala preferring a simple black Kia hatchback. Again, in a country where every public official craves for the most powerful vehicles. He lived simply and probably wanted us to learn something. Servant leadership. Showing off was not his way of life. He also understood that the Catholic Church needed reforms in a world that is rapidly changing. It may not have made him a lot of friends within the conservatives but leadership is about making key decisions including those that are unpopular. That way he endeared many to the church. He wanted a world where peace existed. He prayed for peace and welcomed everyone including many that he probably didn’t agree with. Perhaps if they listened to him, the world would have been different. There would be less destruction. We can all live together. He kissed the feet of warrying parties and urged them to embrace peace. Those whose feet he kissed only shook hands for a day and some are at each other’s throats again. He must have died wondering what needed to be done to stop the wars and killings that go on unabated sometimes fighting for no particular reasons apart from the egos of leaders and wealth that they would still leave on earth. Pope Francis still sent a message to those who deprive wealth of others by stating in his will his desire for a simple burial without the ornaments and all stuff that his position could afford. If he didn’t enjoy a luxurious lifestyle when alive, it would mean nothing to his body. There is a lot that we can learn from Pope Francis. His humility, ability to embrace everyone and putting others first even when it came at a personal cost. He didn’t adhere to the advice of his doctors for complete rest. He kept on meeting people and drove through the crowd in his papal mobile on Easter Sunday. And if leaders can take his example, the world would be a better place. Peaceful and resources shared with everyone. The writer is a communication and visibility consultant. djjuuko@gmail.com

Read More »