#OutToLunch What other sectors can learn from fintech startups

#OutToLunch What other sectors can learn from fintech startups

By Denis Jjuuko

Ugandan and indeed African companies or startups as they are usually called especially in the fintech sector have been on a roll — raising money that wasn’t even previously seen in donor aid programmes. You have probably seen billboards all over Kampala and its suburbs of companies like Chipper Cash or taxis with rear windows branded Wave. Chipper Cash raised some US$250 million last year and Wave attracted US$200 million in September.

Even those that were not necessarily fintech such as Safe Boda got US$50 million from Google (although they are pivoting towards fintech) and Rocket Health which made a lot of inroads during Covid-19 lockdowns by providing home-based and telemedicine solutions recently announced that they had received some US$5 million. There are many others such as Flutterwave, Zembo and Treepz that are getting investor’s money to expand.

In 2020, African startups raised between US$1.3 billion and US$1.5 billion in venture capital. The number for 2021 is believed to be between US$4.5 billion and US$5 billion according to TechTrunch, a technology website that monitors funding in the tech sector.

This kind of interest in African startups is raising young people’s appetite for innovation knowing that they don’t necessarily need to be based in Silcon Valley to attract funding. Of course, the definition of what is an African startup is still out there for debate as some of these businesses aren’t actually owned by Africans rather by people interested in doing business on the continent.

Africa is home to some 1.4 billion people (same population as China) with a median age of 19. Companies like Liquid Technologies are rolling out the internet across the continent while Google and Facebook are working on undersea cables that will further enable more people to connect to the internet.

However, when the time for reaping the profits comes, Africans may not be able to get much since most of this funding is coming from outside the continent. African investors including our beloved swindlers of public funds (since they have been urged to invest the loot at home) need to look at this sector as well. What is it that foreign venture capital firms are seeing on the continent that we aren’t seeing? I don’t think they are just investing for the sake of it. And it might be late by the time we wake up.

Telecom companies providing mobile money services at extortionist rates will soon be looking over their shoulders. It is a matter of time before startups with millions of dollars in funding start eating into their profits but that is an article for another day.

The interest in the tech sector especially fintech by these venture capital firms reminded me of somebody who had an initial meeting with some telecom company that wanted to bring mobile phones in East Africa but never thought it was an idea that would take the region by storm. He missed out on the opportunity of a lifetime.

But also what can other entrepreneurs learn from the venture capital interest on the continent. I haven’t heard much interest in other sectors beyond fintech and technology generally. How do we attract funding in other sectors?

Sectors such as food processing, manufacturing, logistics, and construction need this kind of funding the fintech sector is attracting. Unlike fintech, these sectors will employ much more people on the continent and attract other sectors. For example, where one creates a factory, the real estate sector develops so employees can get housing, supermarkets and even banks set up to serve these employees. Manufacturing by its nature creates a lot of direct and indirect jobs.

There is need for African policy makers and entrepreneurs to understand what attracts large sums of money to the fintech startups and replicate it elsewhere. Africa today must be having the cheapest labour force anywhere in the world and many of these people are easily trainable for the repetitive jobs that manufacturing provides.

If a manufacturing business in Uganda attracted US$250 million in funding, it would actually set up a large factory and employ hundreds of people with sustainable jobs. It’s effect on the economy would be huge. I remember a few years ago, one of the biggest manufacturing companies in Uganda wanted to expand and got a syndicated loan from a few banks in Uganda of just US$100 million, which they used to set up their plant. So imagine the scale a manufacturer would reach with US$250 million in a country like Uganda. It is time for sectors to learn from fintech and attract venture capital.

The writer is a communication and visibility consultant. djjuuko@gmail.com.

Related

Out to Lunch

#OutToLunch: Favourable interest rates are good for everyone, not just government blueprint for politicians and entrepreneurs building churches

#OutToLunch: A blueprint for politicians and entrepreneurs building churches By Denis Jjuuko When it comes to religion, many times politicians, billionaire entrepreneurs, the middle class and other classes agree. At least on building magnificent houses of God. Across Uganda, many people have contributed or even single handedly built these houses of God. Fancy to a fault, majestically standing on hills with spires that compete with those seen in Hollywood movies. Many of these worship centres, particularly those single handedly built by one person or a family with their friends, are usually located in rural areas where the funders were born, walked barefoot to school before migrating to Kampala to find fortune and fame. The floors are of Italian or Spanish marble, porcelain or at worst polished terrazzo. Stained glasses with the beautiful image of the Virgin Mary complete the curvy life size windows. The pews are of the hardest wood. The world’s best sound engineers come in to install the public address system. The house of God must be fancy. Once construction is complete, they call in their Kampala friends for the grand opening. The clergy lines up at the foot of the building to welcome them. The parking lot is full of the most expensive SUVs. The parishioners walk in every prayer day fearful of stepping on the floors, sometimes so shiny that they see their own body reflections. Their best clothes can’t even be used to clean the pews. They can scratch them. For a moment, the poor are in heaven before returning to their houses where floors are screeded with cow dung. There is nothing wrong with people using their fortune and connections to build grand churches or mosques. It is their money; their appreciation of what God has helped them achieve. They no longer have some of these other problems so they can “give back” to God. The problem is whether the grandeur church is what the community really needs. Shouldn’t politicians, the rich and famous first do a needs assessment? Usually, besides the magnificent house of God stands a school with a falling roof or whose walls are being held in place by crooked timber poles. Windows are just wide openings where mild steel frames would do. Inside some of the classrooms, are anthills. Pupils sit on logs and like their homes, the cow dung is the main material used for floor screeding. Teachers look like they last had a decent meal on Christmas day. The health centre is miles away and poorly equipped. The only hope for survival whenever they fall sick is through prayer in the church built for them by the only person who was lucky enough to survive the biting poverty. Yet the funders go to India or Kenya or Germany whenever they feel any discomfort. And are not afraid to give testimony that last time they fell sick, they traveled to Europe for better management and while there, they were thankful to God for their life hence the magnificent church building. Yet the blueprint for an impactful church exists. In most cases wherever the Catholics built a church, they built a school as well and almost everywhere they set up their regional headquarters (read a diocese), they built a functional hospital. They knew that you can’t pastor the dead! They also knew that an educated population is good for them and their beliefs. Some people call it sustainability and perhaps that is why they have existed for millennia. You saw how they put on a show at Pope Francis’ funeral. Why can’t politicians and billionaire businessmen do the same? If you have Shs6 billion (nearly US$2 million) like we heard of the Ssembabule church or the one in Mitooma, why not build a church of Shs2 billion, a school of Shs2 billion and a healthy centre of Shs2 billion? You could also may be build all those with about 70% of the kitty and create an endowment fund with the remaining 30%. The annual interest from the fund could be used to operate the school and the hospital. If 30% of Shs6b is invested say in a long-term treasury bond, it could give a net return of approximately Shs255m per a year or Shs21.3m per a month, enough to subsidize a rural school and health facility. Alternatively, an income generating project could be established alongside the church building. A factory to add value for the parishioners. It could be a dairy plant or a coffee factory depending on the area. A scholarship for the needy bright students could be another alternative. That way people wouldn’t have to meet their creator ahead of time. The writer is a communication and visibility consultant. djjuuko@gmail.com

Read More »
Out to Lunch

#OutToLunch: Favourable interest rates are good for everyone, not just government only we could learn from Pope Francis

#OutToLunch: If only we could learn from Pope Francis By Denis Jjuuko The death of Pope Francis came a little bit as a surprise. He had been seen publicly on Easter Sunday, another surprise, blessing the faithful from the balcony that overlooks St Peter’s Square. Even though he was visibly weak, it seemed he was on the road to recovery after spending more than a month in hospital being treated of double pneumonia. He was 88 years old. Pope Francis is the third pope to die in the last 20 years following John Paul II in April 2005 and Benedict XVI in December 2022 even though he (Benedict) had long resigned from this position due to ill health. That decision of Benedict to resign allowed Francis to assume office in March 2013. Less than two years after his election, Pope Francis made the long trip to Uganda, becoming the third pope to do so largely thanks to the Uganda martyrs. And like most of the papal visits especially to countries like ours, everything comes to a standstill. Roads are paved, buildings are rehabilitated and grass is planted, public holidays granted and that wasn’t any different in 2015. People traveled from far and near to attend the mass that he led. Even our politicians who usually don’t see eye to eye were seen shaking hands at the Uganda Martyrs Shrine in Namugongo. One wished the pope visited every day! Those who met the Pope either in Uganda, the Vatican or elsewhere all talk about his humility. As he departed Uganda, a photo is shared of him climbing the steps to his Shephard One aircraft at Entebbe International Airport. He was walking alone, one hand sometimes holding his papal soutane, and another carrying a black bag, perhaps with personal belongings. He could have had as many aides as he wished. He was the leader of more than a billion Catholics but he lived simply and perhaps sending a message to nobodies that they too can be humble. Many ministers in Uganda never carry their handbags, there is always somebody at hand to do so. He refused to move in expensive limos or SUVs while visiting Kampala preferring a simple black Kia hatchback. Again, in a country where every public official craves for the most powerful vehicles. He lived simply and probably wanted us to learn something. Servant leadership. Showing off was not his way of life. He also understood that the Catholic Church needed reforms in a world that is rapidly changing. It may not have made him a lot of friends within the conservatives but leadership is about making key decisions including those that are unpopular. That way he endeared many to the church. He wanted a world where peace existed. He prayed for peace and welcomed everyone including many that he probably didn’t agree with. Perhaps if they listened to him, the world would have been different. There would be less destruction. We can all live together. He kissed the feet of warrying parties and urged them to embrace peace. Those whose feet he kissed only shook hands for a day and some are at each other’s throats again. He must have died wondering what needed to be done to stop the wars and killings that go on unabated sometimes fighting for no particular reasons apart from the egos of leaders and wealth that they would still leave on earth. Pope Francis still sent a message to those who deprive wealth of others by stating in his will his desire for a simple burial without the ornaments and all stuff that his position could afford. If he didn’t enjoy a luxurious lifestyle when alive, it would mean nothing to his body. There is a lot that we can learn from Pope Francis. His humility, ability to embrace everyone and putting others first even when it came at a personal cost. He didn’t adhere to the advice of his doctors for complete rest. He kept on meeting people and drove through the crowd in his papal mobile on Easter Sunday. And if leaders can take his example, the world would be a better place. Peaceful and resources shared with everyone. The writer is a communication and visibility consultant. djjuuko@gmail.com

Read More »