#OutToLunch Amazon and the culture of succession planning

By Denis Jjuuko

Jeff Bezos, founder of the global unicorn that is Amazon, stepped down from the role of Chief Executive Officer to become executive chairman. Bezos founded Amazon in 1994 and built it into one of the biggest and most profitable companies in the world. After 27 years at the helm and USD200 billion letter in personal wealth, he decided to call it quits.

He says he doesn’t have the time he needs to run this giant as he wants to concentrate on other interests, including charity. In doing so, Bezos is walking in the shoes of fellow billionaires such as Bill Gates who left the companies they founded in their prime to do something else. Bezos is just 57 years old. He could have stayed on for another 30 years but that is what we need to learn from these entrepreneurs. Like Bill Gates before him, Bezos will soon leave the role of executive chairman. He just took it up to ensure the Amazon stock doesn’t take a considerable beating, if he had decided to leave the company at once. It is part of transition planning.

The main reasons these billionaires leave their legacy companies is not because they don’t have time or the drive to carry on. That is usually for public relations. The founders go because they want to create a culture of succession from one chief executive to another and see their businesses live on forever.

The Americans and Europeans usually hand over the businesses to leaders who aren’t necessarily their relatives while the Asians mainly hand over to their offspring. For us in Uganda, we rarely want to hand over the business to anyone. Although we prefer the Asian model of handing over the company to the offspring, many do so without proper succession planning. A parent dies and a child who was not involved in the business at all and who has no experience running anything finds himself in the swivel chair as CEO and Chairman.

That perhaps explains why companies that were household names just 25 years ago are now as quiet as a cemetery. The children who inherited them run them down as fast as they got them. Not because they necessarily wanted to but because they were not prepared to run the businesses in the first place. Instead of paying creditors, they buy a fancy SUV and install blue and red grill flashing lights to announce their arrival as the next big thing. The creditors take them to court and the next time you hear about them is when company assets are being sold on the cheap through auctions.

Of course, not all Ugandan businesses have ended up that way. The Mulwana Group still stands successful many years after its founder’s death and the children and their mother seem to be doing a great job. The Madhavanis have been fine though last year there were some squabbles in the press over some assets.

Succession planning shouldn’t be only for big companies. How do we ensure that small and medium enterprises can survive beyond their founders? The founders need to let go of many things including decision making to people they can groom and trust well in time. The guy who is replacing Bezos at Amazon had been at the firm since 1997, which makes him understand the business. He wasn’t simply parachuted into the CEO role. He had been running Amazon Web Services, the company’s cloud computing arm, which is one of Amazon’s most profitable divisions.

Amazon as successful as it is, its founder could easily have claimed that he is the only one who understands its problems and challenges and therefore should be its CEO for eternity but he didn’t. He understood that his legacy, his company’s success will be determined long after he has stepped down. Given Amazon’s success, nobody was itching for him to leave but he decided that after almost three decades, the business needed new leadership. That is leadership.

If we want our businesses to become as successful or even a quarter as successful as the Amazons and Microsofts of this world, the leaders must adequately plan for the day they won’t be there to run them. This should be done by identifying and grooming leaders and then stepping away when they can still offer advice to the new leaders.

 

The writer is a communication and visibility consultant. djjuuko@gmail.com 

 

Related

Out to Lunch

#OutToLunch: Favourable interest rates are good for everyone, not just government blueprint for politicians and entrepreneurs building churches

#OutToLunch: A blueprint for politicians and entrepreneurs building churches By Denis Jjuuko When it comes to religion, many times politicians, billionaire entrepreneurs, the middle class and other classes agree. At least on building magnificent houses of God. Across Uganda, many people have contributed or even single handedly built these houses of God. Fancy to a fault, majestically standing on hills with spires that compete with those seen in Hollywood movies. Many of these worship centres, particularly those single handedly built by one person or a family with their friends, are usually located in rural areas where the funders were born, walked barefoot to school before migrating to Kampala to find fortune and fame. The floors are of Italian or Spanish marble, porcelain or at worst polished terrazzo. Stained glasses with the beautiful image of the Virgin Mary complete the curvy life size windows. The pews are of the hardest wood. The world’s best sound engineers come in to install the public address system. The house of God must be fancy. Once construction is complete, they call in their Kampala friends for the grand opening. The clergy lines up at the foot of the building to welcome them. The parking lot is full of the most expensive SUVs. The parishioners walk in every prayer day fearful of stepping on the floors, sometimes so shiny that they see their own body reflections. Their best clothes can’t even be used to clean the pews. They can scratch them. For a moment, the poor are in heaven before returning to their houses where floors are screeded with cow dung. There is nothing wrong with people using their fortune and connections to build grand churches or mosques. It is their money; their appreciation of what God has helped them achieve. They no longer have some of these other problems so they can “give back” to God. The problem is whether the grandeur church is what the community really needs. Shouldn’t politicians, the rich and famous first do a needs assessment? Usually, besides the magnificent house of God stands a school with a falling roof or whose walls are being held in place by crooked timber poles. Windows are just wide openings where mild steel frames would do. Inside some of the classrooms, are anthills. Pupils sit on logs and like their homes, the cow dung is the main material used for floor screeding. Teachers look like they last had a decent meal on Christmas day. The health centre is miles away and poorly equipped. The only hope for survival whenever they fall sick is through prayer in the church built for them by the only person who was lucky enough to survive the biting poverty. Yet the funders go to India or Kenya or Germany whenever they feel any discomfort. And are not afraid to give testimony that last time they fell sick, they traveled to Europe for better management and while there, they were thankful to God for their life hence the magnificent church building. Yet the blueprint for an impactful church exists. In most cases wherever the Catholics built a church, they built a school as well and almost everywhere they set up their regional headquarters (read a diocese), they built a functional hospital. They knew that you can’t pastor the dead! They also knew that an educated population is good for them and their beliefs. Some people call it sustainability and perhaps that is why they have existed for millennia. You saw how they put on a show at Pope Francis’ funeral. Why can’t politicians and billionaire businessmen do the same? If you have Shs6 billion (nearly US$2 million) like we heard of the Ssembabule church or the one in Mitooma, why not build a church of Shs2 billion, a school of Shs2 billion and a healthy centre of Shs2 billion? You could also may be build all those with about 70% of the kitty and create an endowment fund with the remaining 30%. The annual interest from the fund could be used to operate the school and the hospital. If 30% of Shs6b is invested say in a long-term treasury bond, it could give a net return of approximately Shs255m per a year or Shs21.3m per a month, enough to subsidize a rural school and health facility. Alternatively, an income generating project could be established alongside the church building. A factory to add value for the parishioners. It could be a dairy plant or a coffee factory depending on the area. A scholarship for the needy bright students could be another alternative. That way people wouldn’t have to meet their creator ahead of time. The writer is a communication and visibility consultant. djjuuko@gmail.com

Read More »
Out to Lunch

#OutToLunch: Favourable interest rates are good for everyone, not just government only we could learn from Pope Francis

#OutToLunch: If only we could learn from Pope Francis By Denis Jjuuko The death of Pope Francis came a little bit as a surprise. He had been seen publicly on Easter Sunday, another surprise, blessing the faithful from the balcony that overlooks St Peter’s Square. Even though he was visibly weak, it seemed he was on the road to recovery after spending more than a month in hospital being treated of double pneumonia. He was 88 years old. Pope Francis is the third pope to die in the last 20 years following John Paul II in April 2005 and Benedict XVI in December 2022 even though he (Benedict) had long resigned from this position due to ill health. That decision of Benedict to resign allowed Francis to assume office in March 2013. Less than two years after his election, Pope Francis made the long trip to Uganda, becoming the third pope to do so largely thanks to the Uganda martyrs. And like most of the papal visits especially to countries like ours, everything comes to a standstill. Roads are paved, buildings are rehabilitated and grass is planted, public holidays granted and that wasn’t any different in 2015. People traveled from far and near to attend the mass that he led. Even our politicians who usually don’t see eye to eye were seen shaking hands at the Uganda Martyrs Shrine in Namugongo. One wished the pope visited every day! Those who met the Pope either in Uganda, the Vatican or elsewhere all talk about his humility. As he departed Uganda, a photo is shared of him climbing the steps to his Shephard One aircraft at Entebbe International Airport. He was walking alone, one hand sometimes holding his papal soutane, and another carrying a black bag, perhaps with personal belongings. He could have had as many aides as he wished. He was the leader of more than a billion Catholics but he lived simply and perhaps sending a message to nobodies that they too can be humble. Many ministers in Uganda never carry their handbags, there is always somebody at hand to do so. He refused to move in expensive limos or SUVs while visiting Kampala preferring a simple black Kia hatchback. Again, in a country where every public official craves for the most powerful vehicles. He lived simply and probably wanted us to learn something. Servant leadership. Showing off was not his way of life. He also understood that the Catholic Church needed reforms in a world that is rapidly changing. It may not have made him a lot of friends within the conservatives but leadership is about making key decisions including those that are unpopular. That way he endeared many to the church. He wanted a world where peace existed. He prayed for peace and welcomed everyone including many that he probably didn’t agree with. Perhaps if they listened to him, the world would have been different. There would be less destruction. We can all live together. He kissed the feet of warrying parties and urged them to embrace peace. Those whose feet he kissed only shook hands for a day and some are at each other’s throats again. He must have died wondering what needed to be done to stop the wars and killings that go on unabated sometimes fighting for no particular reasons apart from the egos of leaders and wealth that they would still leave on earth. Pope Francis still sent a message to those who deprive wealth of others by stating in his will his desire for a simple burial without the ornaments and all stuff that his position could afford. If he didn’t enjoy a luxurious lifestyle when alive, it would mean nothing to his body. There is a lot that we can learn from Pope Francis. His humility, ability to embrace everyone and putting others first even when it came at a personal cost. He didn’t adhere to the advice of his doctors for complete rest. He kept on meeting people and drove through the crowd in his papal mobile on Easter Sunday. And if leaders can take his example, the world would be a better place. Peaceful and resources shared with everyone. The writer is a communication and visibility consultant. djjuuko@gmail.com

Read More »